Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo in 05_torch_connector.ipynb #703

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

FelixLehn
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Simple feature map -> simple parameterized ansatz

Details and comments

There is a typo in the comments at line 602 in the regression task. A simple parameterized ansatz is initialized in the code cells and not again a feature map.

There is a typo in the comments at line 602 in the regression task. A simple parameterized ansatz is initialized in the code cells and not again a feature map.
Copy link
Member

@woodsp-ibm woodsp-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the correction, LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 26, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6656720182

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.689%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6656716448: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1851
Relevant Lines: 1997

💛 - Coveralls

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3d676d1 into qiskit-community:main Oct 26, 2023
15 checks passed
oscar-wallis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
There is a typo in the comments at line 602 in the regression task. A simple parameterized ansatz is initialized in the code cells and not again a feature map.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants